Published in Singapore’s Straits Times on 09 September 2004 and accessed here.

Posted on September 9th, 2004 by jl
Filed under: Developmental Issues | No Comments »

This was published in MalaysiaKini.com and the New Straits Times on 09 December.

Posted on December 10th, 2003 by jl
Filed under: Developmental Issues | No Comments »

This story was filed in Bernama, the Malaysian news agency, at 1640H on 16 September 2003 and was taken from here.

Posted on September 18th, 2003 by jl
Filed under: ASEAN, Developmental Issues, Intl Trade, WTO | No Comments »

This article appeared in the IHT on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 and can be obtained at this link.

Posted on July 17th, 2003 by jl
Filed under: ASEAN, Developmental Issues, IMF, Intl Financial System, Regional Financial Concerns: Asia | No Comments »

1. Fiscal Discipline. This was in the context of a region where almost all the countries had run large deficits that led to balance of payments crises and high inflation that hit mainly the poor because the rich could park their money abroad.

2. Reordering Public Expenditure Priorities. This suggested switching expenditure in a pro-growth and pro-poor way, from things like non-merit subsidies to basic health and education, and infrastructure.

3. Tax reform. Constructing a tax system that would combine a broad tax base with moderate marginal tax rates.

4. Liberalizing Interest Rates. In retrospect I wish I had formulated this in a broader way as financial liberalization, stressed that views differed on how fast it should be achieved, and recognized the importance of accompanying financial liberalization with prudential supervision.

5. A Competitive Exchange Rate. I fear I indulged in wishful thinking in asserting that there was a consensus in favor of ensuring that the exchange rate would be competitive, which implies an intermediate regime; in fact Washington was already beginning to edge toward the two-corner doctrine which holds that a country must either fix firmly or float “cleanly”.

6. Trade Liberalization. I acknowledged that there was a difference of view about how fast trade should be liberalized, but everyone agreed that was the appropriate direction to move.

7. Liberalization of Inward Foreign Direct Investment. I specifically did not include comprehensive capital account liberalization, because that did not command a consensus in Washington.

8. Privatization. This was the one area in which what originated as a neoliberal idea had won broad acceptance. We have since been made very conscious that it matters a lot how privatization is done: it can be a highly corrupt process that transfers assets to a privileged elite for a fraction of their true value, but the evidence is that it brings benefits when done properly, and the privatized enterprise either sells into a competitive market or is properly regulated.

9. Deregulation. This focused specifically on easing barriers to entry and exit, not on abolishing regulations designed for safety or environmental reasons.

10 Property Rights. This was primarily about providing the informal sector with the ability to gain property rights at acceptable cost.

(from The Washington Consensus and Beyond )
by John Williamson
Senior Fellow, Institute for International Economics, USA

Posted on July 1st, 2003 by jl
Filed under: Developmental Issues, IMF, Intl Economics, Intl Financial System, World Bank | No Comments »